IPs

V455 And
V515 And
AE Aqr
FO Aqr
V349 Aqr
XY Ari
V405 Aur
V647 Aur
HT Cam
MU Cam
DW Cnc
BG CMi
V709 Cas
V1033 Cas
V1025 Cen
TV Col
TX Col
UU Col
V2069 Cyg
V2306 Cyg
DO Dra
PQ Gem
V418 Gem
DQ Her
V1323 Her
V1460 Her
V1674 Her
EX Hya
NY Lup
V2400 Oph
V2731 Oph
V3037 Oph
V598 Peg
GK Per
AO Psc
HZ Pup
V667 Pup
WX Pyx
V1223 Sgr
V4743 Sgr
CC Scl
V1062 Tau
EI UMa
AX J1740.1
AX J1832.3
AX J1853.3
CTCV J2056
CXO J174954
IGR J04571
IGR J08390
IGR J15094
IGR J16500
IGR J16547
IGR J17014
IGR J17195
IGR J18151
IGR J18173
IGR J18308
IGR J19267
LAMOST 0240
PBC J0927.8
PBC J1841.1
RX J1804
RX J2015
RX J2113
RX J2133
RX J2306
Swift J0717
Swift J1839
Swift J2006
Swift J2138

Full Catalog

Related Systems

Home Reviews IPs & Candidates Issues Links Gallery News

Asynchronous Polars and Nearly Synchronous IPs

Polars and IPs are clearly related subclasses of magnetic CVs, and the distinction between the two classes are not always clear-cut, with subclasses such as diskless IPs and asynchronous polars (APs) muddying the water.

Here, we adopt a definition that APs are polars in a temporary state of asynchronism. That is, in APs, the equilibrium spin period is assumed to equal the orbital period, but the current spin period deviates from this equality. In the prototype, V1500 Cyg, we believe it was the 1975 nova eruption that caused this temporary asynchronism; observations since then have tracked its march back towards synchronicity, which is estimated to take of order 150 years. Systematic spin period change is also seen in another well-studied AP, V1432 Aql, although in this case the synchronization time scale is much longer at ~4 Myr (still much shorter than the evolutionary time scale of the binary).

When we adopt "temporary asynchronism" as the defining characteristic of APs, confirmation of membership requires a determination of spin period derivative: if the spin period is approaching synchronism over a time scale mush shorter than the evolutionary one, then it is a confirmed AP.

Table 1 of Littlefield et al. (2023) 9 APs and related systems, many of which do not have a good measurement of spin period derivative. We consider many of these to be AP candidates. However, we must question how realistic it is to knock off a polar far from synchronism (via nova eruptions or any other, hitherto unarticularted, mechanisms).

Here we adopt an arbitrary limit of 5% asynchronism as the outer boundary of APs and AP candidates. If a spin period of a magnetic CV is well over the canonical value of 10% but less than 95%, we will use the label "nearly synchronous IPs." Currently, this label applies to Swift J0503.7-2819 and 1RXS J052430.2+424449, nicknamed "Paloma,"


Home Reviews IPs & Candidates Issues Links Gallery News

Please send your comments, suggestions etc. to Koji.Mukai@nasa.gov and/or Koji.Mukai@umbc.edu
NASA Logo, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Goddard