[Fri Jun  7 07:19:43 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (208.2, 441.9) = 20 48 41.75 29 48 28.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 417.6 +/- 45.1
  Background counts = 905.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0004

[Fri Jun  7 07:20:00 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.29'
[Fri Jun  7 07:42:39 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  7 07:42:39 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.57"
[Fri Jun  7 07:42:39 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 40, frac = 0.870
[Fri Jun  7 07:42:39 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 0, mean size = 12.57"
[Sat Jun  8 06:29:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  8 06:29:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Sat Jun  8 06:29:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  8 06:29:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Sat Jun  8 06:29:09 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  8 06:29:12 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  8 06:29:12 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Sat Jun  8 06:29:12 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  8 06:29:12 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Sat Jun  8 06:29:12 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  8 18:05:36 2013] Warning, spatial fit 67 centroid is now closest to src. 76
[Sat Jun  8 18:05:37 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  8 18:05:37 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  8 18:05:37 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  8 18:05:37 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  8 18:05:37 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  8 18:05:37 2013] Source is confused with source 89
[Sat Jun  8 18:07:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  8 18:07:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.57"
[Sat Jun  8 18:07:09 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 40, frac = 0.870
[Sat Jun  8 18:07:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 66 for pass 1, mean size = 12.57"
[Sun Jun  9 16:44:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 16:44:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.csv
[Sun Jun  9 16:44:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 16:44:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.csv
[Sun Jun  9 16:44:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 16:44:56 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 16:44:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.csv
[Sun Jun  9 16:44:56 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 16:44:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.csv
[Sun Jun  9 16:44:56 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:58 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 11888.200000, observed total counts = 10056.000000
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:58 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 81
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:58 2013] Warning, spatial fit 66 centroid is now closest to src. 88
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:58 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 10398.300000, observed total counts = 6138.000000
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:58 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 81
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:58 2013] Source 81 is offset by -1.868290 and 3.011051 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.364832 x 1.364832, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:59 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:59 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:59 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:59 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 10:41:59 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 10:43:56 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(18066.034760, 38399.385468, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 10 10:43:56 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src81_src.reg
[Mon Jun 10 10:43:56 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (171, 404) - (246, 479)
[Mon Jun 10 10:43:56 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(18066.034760, 38399.385468, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21049.939880, 36010.929077, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19137.332200, 27822.146800, 9088.608262, 6903.936199, 7.386500, X, Y) && !ellipse(21047.280869, 37107.002167, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20682.447983, 39228.606873, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18910.958008, 38669.508148, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20167.635147, 39011.595398, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20645.150000, 37963.382600, 1909.552055, 1244.992036, 103.347600, X, Y) && !ellipse(17060.241959, 38035.134033, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19496.231339, 38929.297455, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17913.985214, 38049.731384, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19172.746552, 37643.575623, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18088.273285, 37377.464691, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17130.219238, 37369.815552, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18939.361511, 38240.120880, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(15595.066000, 36478.774000, 1995.968057, 1995.968057, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18268.414368, 36392.501923, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17674.979477, 36573.551025, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16523.243698, 36325.125244, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19722.338000, 39230.054000, 1995.968057, 1785.840051, 359.991000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 10 10:43:56 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0693400101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src81.gif