[Tue Jul 16 19:59:46 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (177.4, 323.0) = 22 12 15.26 -3 47 3.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 59.9 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 29.5
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Tue Jul 16 19:59:46 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.96'
[Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.91"
[Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.995
[Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 10.91"
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 15.167083 pixels away
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.91"
[Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.995
[Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 10.91"
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Warning: source 11 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 12.102946 pixels away
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9