[Tue Jul 16 19:59:46 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (355.1, 332.7) = 22 11 23.61 -3 46 22.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 55.8 +/- 11.1 Background counts = 25.7 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005 [Tue Jul 16 19:59:46 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.80' [Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.83" [Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.977 [Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 8.83" [Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists [Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 159.720000, observed total counts = 139.000000 [Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.83" [Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.977 [Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 8.83" [Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists [Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv [Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv [Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists [Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv [Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv [Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 159.633000, observed total counts = 139.000000 [Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9