[Tue Jul 16 19:59:46 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (165.8, 201.4) = 22 12 18.64 -3 55 53.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 57.7 +/- 11.2
  Background counts = 24.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Jul 16 19:59:46 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.92'
[Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.39"
[Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 44, mask sum = 46, frac = 1.026
[Tue Jul 16 20:48:35 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 12.39"
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Tue Jul 16 21:13:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Warning: source 25 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 12.886935 pixels away
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 16 21:59:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.39"
[Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 44, mask sum = 46, frac = 1.026
[Tue Jul 16 22:31:32 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 12.39"
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Tue Jul 16 22:54:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0693010601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Warning: source 21 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 12.788891 pixels away
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 16 23:33:12 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9