[Wed Jun 19 07:56:27 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (108.3, 435.3) = 8 22 38.02 -43 9 36.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 363.5 +/- 50.8
  Background counts = 1009.6
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.001

[Wed Jun 19 07:56:35 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 16.98'
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.92"
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] source mask rpix=3.4, npix_max = 61, mask sum = 44, frac = 0.712
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 71 for pass 0, mean size = 14.92"
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:23 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:23 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:23 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:25 2013] Source 74 is offset by 3.304640 and 7.469756 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.105104 x 5.105104, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:25 2013] Warning, spatial fit 71 centroid is now closest to src. 81
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Source is confused with source 68
[Thu Jun 20 08:59:53 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 20 08:59:53 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.92"
[Thu Jun 20 08:59:53 2013] source mask rpix=3.4, npix_max = 61, mask sum = 44, frac = 0.712
[Thu Jun 20 08:59:53 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 1, mean size = 14.92"
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:44 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:44 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:44 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:44 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:44 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Warning: source 58 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 74 at 13.325933 pixels away
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Warning, spatial fit 63 centroid is now closest to src. 71
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Warning: source 98 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 74 at 13.659443 pixels away
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul  2 11:22:45 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(9376.159714, 37818.382751, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jul  2 11:22:45 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src74_src.reg
[Tue Jul  2 11:22:45 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (71, 398) - (146, 473)
[Tue Jul  2 11:22:45 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(9376.159714, 37818.382751, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20457.404000, 42032.820000, 12598.032363, 8930.040257, 35.604000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17328.100000, 38667.504000, 10656.864307, 8974.416258, 39.780600, X, Y) && !ellipse(10545.931770, 39192.073669, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(9597.939621, 38402.767975, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(9794.510025, 37988.426758, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11786.992691, 37324.685364, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18911.045000, 35330.730000, 8842.032254, 4662.096134, 130.969000, X, Y) && !ellipse(8393.950000, 35406.333800, 2333.944067, 1464.224042, 161.861027, X, Y) && !ellipse(11356.684128, 35088.016998, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(7883.873283, 35435.366516, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20717.720000, 34194.362000, 9489.024273, 9489.024273, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11572.738000, 34616.432000, 2175.728063, 1601.072046, 73.779717, X, Y)
[Tue Jul  2 11:22:45 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src74.gif