[Wed Jun 19 07:56:26 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (427.3, 444.7) = 8 20 31.21 -43 9 24.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 177.3 +/- 34.0
  Background counts = 478.1
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008

[Wed Jun 19 07:56:35 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.13'
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.49"
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.944
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 0, mean size = 13.49"
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:22 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:22 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:22 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:25 2013] Source 63 is offset by -4.905235 and -5.139961 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.587848 x 1.587848, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:25 2013] Source 63 is offset by 1.884857 and 1.368820 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.560520 x 1.560520, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:25 2013] Source 63 is offset by 2.632351 and -6.220357 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.535329 x 1.535329, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:25 2013] Warning, spatial fit 60 centroid is now closest to src. 79
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:25 2013] Source 63 is offset by 6.111845 and 1.471556 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.460713 x 1.460713, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9