[Wed Jun 19 07:56:25 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (171.0, 473.5) = 8 22 13.06 -43 7 4.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 695.3 +/- 55.2
  Background counts = 1499.9
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001

[Wed Jun 19 07:56:35 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.70'
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.28"
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 57, mask sum = 44, frac = 0.769
[Wed Jun 19 08:12:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 14.28"
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:21 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:21 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Wed Jun 19 19:38:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:25 2013] Warning: source 26 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 30 at 12.704041 pixels away
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:25 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 20135.500000, observed total counts = 13713.000000
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:25 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 30
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 20 08:57:26 2013] Source is confused with source 28
[Thu Jun 20 08:59:53 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 20 08:59:53 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.28"
[Thu Jun 20 08:59:53 2013] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 57, mask sum = 44, frac = 0.769
[Thu Jun 20 08:59:53 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 1, mean size = 14.28"
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:43 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:43 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:43 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:48:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:15 2013] Warning: source 26 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 30 at 12.704041 pixels away
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:15 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 19514.100000, observed total counts = 13713.000000
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:15 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 30
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul  2 11:21:16 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul  2 11:22:39 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(14831.067413, 41145.601746, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jul  2 11:22:39 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src30_src.reg
[Tue Jul  2 11:22:39 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (134, 436) - (209, 511)
[Tue Jul  2 11:22:39 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(14831.067413, 41145.601746, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20457.404000, 42032.820000, 12598.032363, 8930.040257, 35.604000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19136.561400, 35428.485620, 5405.856156, 3436.176099, 120.026600, X, Y) && !ellipse(16254.772446, 41574.566864, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(15385.983139, 41292.873566, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16001.361847, 39917.446259, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16879.048620, 40257.832000, 2169.984062, 1446.896042, 249.517000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17328.100000, 38667.504000, 10656.864307, 8974.416258, 39.780600, X, Y) && !ellipse(18389.938000, 37296.012000, 1895.576055, 1656.712048, 219.147000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18911.045000, 35330.730000, 8842.032254, 4662.096134, 130.969000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20717.720000, 34194.362000, 9489.024273, 9489.024273, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jul  2 11:22:39 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0690970101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src30.gif