[Thu May 30 07:20:00 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (289.0, 376.0) = 5 11 27.07 -67 34 57.7
  Extent = 21.7" x 21.7", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 57.6 +/- 11.6
  Background counts = 242.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Thu May 30 07:20:01 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.67'
[Thu May 30 07:37:30 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 07:37:30 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.26"
[Thu May 30 07:37:30 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.085
[Thu May 30 07:37:30 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 9.26"
[Thu May 30 07:50:31 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 07:50:31 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 07:50:31 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 30 07:50:31 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 07:50:31 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 07:50:31 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 30 07:50:35 2013] Source 4 is offset by -1.527084 and -0.657194 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.064644 x 1.064644, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 30 07:50:35 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 30 07:50:35 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 30 07:50:35 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 30 07:50:35 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 30 07:50:35 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 30 08:04:45 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 08:04:45 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.26"
[Thu May 30 08:04:45 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.085
[Thu May 30 08:04:45 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 9.26"
[Thu May 30 08:15:30 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 08:15:30 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 08:15:30 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 30 08:15:30 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 08:15:30 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Thu May 30 08:15:30 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 08:15:30 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Thu May 30 08:15:30 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0690742001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 08:15:37 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 95.147800, observed total counts = 105.000000
[Thu May 30 08:15:37 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 4 = 1.609417 pixels
[Thu May 30 08:15:37 2013] 97.458490 total counts/ 91.978000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.571449
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 4 = 1.609417 pixels
  Position = (290.4, 376.7) = 5 11 25.96 -67 34 51.7
  Extent = 3.4" x 2.3", rotation angle = 190
  Source counts = 5.5 +/- 9.9
  Background counts = 92.0
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability