[Thu May 9 00:52:30 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (362.9, 185.0) = 19 1 15.49 -37 3 46.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 49.1 +/- 8.7 Background counts = 3.1 Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001 [Thu May 9 00:52:30 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.46' [Thu May 9 02:49:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.16 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 9 02:49:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.16" [Thu May 9 02:49:09 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.958 [Thu May 9 02:49:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 0, mean size = 11.16" [Thu May 9 03:26:48 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg exists [Thu May 9 03:26:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.csv [Thu May 9 03:26:48 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg exists [Thu May 9 03:26:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.csv [Thu May 9 03:26:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 9 03:26:48 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists [Thu May 9 03:26:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.csv [Thu May 9 03:26:48 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists [Thu May 9 03:26:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.csv [Thu May 9 03:26:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 9 03:27:02 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 83.118900, observed total counts = 74.000000 [Thu May 9 03:27:02 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 23 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Thu May 9 03:27:02 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu May 9 03:27:02 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu May 9 03:27:02 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Thu May 9 03:27:02 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Thu May 9 03:27:02 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu May 9 05:04:26 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.16 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 9 05:04:26 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.16" [Thu May 9 05:04:26 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.958 [Thu May 9 05:04:26 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 11.16" [Thu May 9 05:25:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists [Thu May 9 05:25:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv [Thu May 9 05:25:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists [Thu May 9 05:25:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv [Thu May 9 05:25:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 9 05:25:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Thu May 9 05:25:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv [Thu May 9 05:25:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Thu May 9 05:25:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv [Thu May 9 05:25:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 9 05:25:21 2013] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 23 at 84.747664 pixels away [Thu May 9 05:25:21 2013] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 23 at 15.349146 pixels away [Thu May 9 05:25:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu May 9 05:25:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu May 9 05:25:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Thu May 9 05:25:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Thu May 9 05:25:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00