[Thu May  9 00:52:06 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (383.5, 400.8) = 19 1 8.10 -36 48 4.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 206.8 +/- 23.3
  Background counts = 3.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Thu May  9 00:52:07 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.65'
[Thu May  9 02:01:07 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  9 02:01:07 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.25"
[Thu May  9 02:01:07 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.603
[Thu May  9 02:01:07 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 11.25"
[Thu May  9 02:49:08 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 02:49:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Thu May  9 02:49:08 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 02:49:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Thu May  9 02:49:08 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  9 02:49:09 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 02:49:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Thu May  9 02:49:09 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 02:49:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Thu May  9 02:49:09 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  9 03:26:58 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3671.780000, observed total counts = 249.000000
[Thu May  9 03:26:58 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May  9 03:26:58 2013] Source 2 is offset by 3.774315 and -0.349920 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.309738 x 1.309738, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May  9 03:26:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  9 03:26:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  9 03:26:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May  9 03:26:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  9 03:26:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May  9 03:26:58 2013] Source is confused with source 3
[Thu May  9 04:17:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  9 04:17:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.25"
[Thu May  9 04:17:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.603
[Thu May  9 04:17:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 11.25"
[Thu May  9 05:04:26 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 05:04:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Thu May  9 05:04:26 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 05:04:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Thu May  9 05:04:26 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  9 05:04:26 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 05:04:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Thu May  9 05:04:26 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 05:04:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Thu May  9 05:04:26 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  9 05:25:19 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1872.490000, observed total counts = 249.000000
[Thu May  9 05:25:19 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May  9 05:25:19 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  9 05:25:19 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  9 05:25:19 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May  9 05:25:19 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  9 05:25:19 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May  9 06:15:38 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(33315.689362, 34822.306976, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Thu May  9 06:15:38 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src2_src.reg
[Thu May  9 06:15:38 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (346, 363) - (421, 438)
[Thu May  9 06:15:38 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(33315.689362, 34822.306976, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33653.961334, 34349.231201, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Thu May  9 06:15:38 2013] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src2.gif
[Thu May  9 06:21:18 2013] Mean detx,y = (-11550.53, -7096.03) 
[Thu May  9 06:21:19 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Thu May  9 06:21:33 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Thu May  9 06:21:33 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src2_src_b10.pi.gz
[Thu May  9 06:21:33 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0679990701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src2_bgd.pi.gz