[Thu Jun 20 00:28:43 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (136.1, 241.8) = 17 37 28.56 -44 49 41.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 200.3 +/- 18.7 Background counts = 15.1 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0004 [Thu Jun 20 00:28:48 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.47' [Thu Jun 20 12:38:50 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jun 20 12:38:50 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.66" [Thu Jun 20 12:38:50 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.903 [Thu Jun 20 12:38:50 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 0, mean size = 12.66" [Thu Jun 20 21:29:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.ximg exists [Thu Jun 20 21:29:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.csv [Thu Jun 20 21:29:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 20 21:29:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.csv [Thu Jun 20 21:29:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jun 20 21:29:21 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists [Thu Jun 20 21:29:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.csv [Thu Jun 20 21:29:21 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 20 21:29:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.csv [Thu Jun 20 21:29:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jun 20 21:30:10 2013] Warning: source 81 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 22 at 16.405843 pixels away [Thu Jun 20 21:30:11 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Jun 20 21:30:11 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Jun 20 21:30:11 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Jun 20 21:30:11 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Jun 20 21:30:11 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jun 21 08:36:10 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jun 21 08:36:10 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.66" [Fri Jun 21 08:36:10 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.903 [Fri Jun 21 08:36:10 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 1, mean size = 12.66" [Fri Jun 21 17:10:58 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg exists [Fri Jun 21 17:10:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.csv [Fri Jun 21 17:10:58 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 21 17:10:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.csv [Fri Jun 21 17:10:58 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 21 17:11:01 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists [Fri Jun 21 17:11:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.csv [Fri Jun 21 17:11:01 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 21 17:11:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.csv [Fri Jun 21 17:11:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 21 17:11:55 2013] Warning, spatial fit 79 centroid is now closest to src. 89 [Fri Jun 21 17:11:56 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jun 21 17:11:56 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jun 21 17:11:56 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jun 21 17:11:56 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jun 21 17:11:56 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jun 21 17:11:56 2013] Source is confused with source 8 [Fri Jun 21 18:22:49 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(11787.851593, 20990.888046, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri Jun 21 18:22:49 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src22_src.reg [Fri Jun 21 18:22:49 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (99, 204) - (174, 279) [Fri Jun 21 18:22:49 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(11787.851593, 20990.888046, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11348.217239, 23879.003693, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(12404.090400, 20886.615140, 1980.480057, 247.560007, 7.445510, X, Y) && !ellipse(15340.052000, 24023.192000, 1727.744050, 305.047209, 336.751100, X, Y) && !ellipse(14305.277359, 21784.424530, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11988.514725, 23076.234344, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(13799.704025, 21847.640778, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(14205.161514, 22250.448547, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(13689.761917, 22274.258850, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(13271.504532, 22297.025726, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(14210.325546, 23638.343872, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(13699.548355, 23889.286621, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri Jun 21 18:22:49 2013] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src22.gif [Fri Jun 21 19:09:51 2013] Mean detx,y = (15505.97, -5604.39) [Fri Jun 21 19:09:52 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Fri Jun 21 19:10:11 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Fri Jun 21 19:10:11 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src22_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri Jun 21 19:10:11 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0679380301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src22_bgd.pi.gz [Fri Jun 21 22:13:54 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Fri Jun 21 22:13:54 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts