[Tue Sep  4 08:33:46 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (134.1, 259.6) = 2 10 45.23 -6 12 45.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 29.9 +/- 8.4
  Background counts = 5.4
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 7e-05

[Tue Sep  4 08:33:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.24'
[Tue Sep  4 09:59:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep  4 09:59:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.55"
[Tue Sep  4 09:59:25 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.069
[Tue Sep  4 09:59:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 12.55"
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:46 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12 appears to have run properly
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:46 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:57 2012] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 15.788591 pixels away
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep  4 10:15:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Sep  4 11:45:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep  4 11:45:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.55"
[Tue Sep  4 11:45:20 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.069
[Tue Sep  4 11:45:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 12.55"
[Tue Sep  4 12:03:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 12:03:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Tue Sep  4 12:03:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 12:03:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Tue Sep  4 12:03:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 12:03:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 12:03:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 12:03:51 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0677670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11 appears to have run properly
[Tue Sep  4 12:04:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 99.884300, observed total counts = 100.000000
[Tue Sep  4 12:04:06 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 0.088679 pixels
[Tue Sep  4 12:04:06 2012] 100.763400 total counts/ 85.421400 bgd. counts: snr = 1.659964
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 0.088679 pixels
  Position = (134.1, 259.7) = 2 10 45.25 -6 12 43.5
  Extent = 4.8 (3.1-7.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 15.3 +/- 10.0
  Background counts = 85.4
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 9e-05
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability