[Fri Sep  7 19:03:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (277.1, 98.3) = 4 13 56.52 -38 20 3.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 54.9 +/- 13.6
  Background counts = 46.4
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Fri Sep  7 19:03:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.60'
[Fri Sep  7 19:05:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep  7 19:05:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.73"
[Fri Sep  7 19:05:31 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 55, frac = 1.029
[Fri Sep  7 19:05:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 13.73"
[Fri Sep  7 19:44:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 19:44:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Fri Sep  7 19:44:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 19:44:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Fri Sep  7 19:44:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep  7 19:44:58 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 19:44:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Fri Sep  7 19:44:58 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 19:44:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Fri Sep  7 19:44:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep  7 20:52:43 2012] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 12.955895 pixels away
[Fri Sep  7 20:52:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep  7 20:52:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep  7 20:52:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Sep  7 20:52:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep  7 20:52:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Sep  7 20:52:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep  7 20:52:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.73"
[Fri Sep  7 20:52:55 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 55, frac = 1.029
[Fri Sep  7 20:52:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 13.73"
[Fri Sep  7 21:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 21:27:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Fri Sep  7 21:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 21:27:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Fri Sep  7 21:27:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep  7 21:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 21:27:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Fri Sep  7 21:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 21:27:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Fri Sep  7 21:27:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0677181001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep  7 22:38:40 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 476.387000, observed total counts = 420.000000
[Fri Sep  7 22:38:40 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Sep  7 22:38:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep  7 22:38:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep  7 22:38:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Sep  7 22:38:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep  7 22:38:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Sep  7 22:38:40 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9