[Mon Jun  3 10:20:27 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (293.0, 313.9) = 20 34 56.61 -35 48 44.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 63.9 +/- 13.0
  Background counts = 73.3
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Mon Jun  3 10:20:28 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.19'
[Mon Jun  3 10:23:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  3 10:23:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.02"
[Mon Jun  3 10:23:34 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.503
[Mon Jun  3 10:23:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 31 for pass 0, mean size = 7.02"
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:51 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:51 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.csv
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.csv
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Source 32 is offset by 4.661632 and -5.873019 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.312423 x 3.530110, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.02"
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:43 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.503
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 7.02"
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:06 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:06 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:06 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:07 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:07 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Source 32 is offset by -6.387012 and 3.129740 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.807356 x 0.807356, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9