[Mon Jun  3 10:20:26 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (225.8, 350.7) = 20 35 20.62 -35 46 2.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 65.8 +/- 10.2
  Background counts = 18.4
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Mon Jun  3 10:20:28 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.49'
[Mon Jun  3 10:23:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  3 10:23:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.67"
[Mon Jun  3 10:23:34 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.977
[Mon Jun  3 10:23:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 9.67"
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Mon Jun  3 13:50:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 226.041000, observed total counts = 199.000000
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 21
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:09 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.67"
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:43 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.977
[Mon Jun  3 18:02:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 9.67"
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:05 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:05 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:07 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:07 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Mon Jun  3 20:40:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0675470301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 225.117000, observed total counts = 199.000000
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 21
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun  4 00:09:36 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9