[Sat May 18 01:07:31 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (371.8, 305.2) = 0 42 24.30 41 15 57.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 60.1 +/- 16.2
  Background counts = 32.6
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001

[Sat May 18 01:07:32 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.34'
[Sat May 18 13:29:18 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 18 13:29:18 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.10"
[Sat May 18 13:29:18 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.633
[Sat May 18 13:29:18 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 77 for pass 0, mean size = 9.10"
[Sat May 18 17:53:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 17:53:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77.csv
[Sat May 18 17:53:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 17:53:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77.csv
[Sat May 18 17:53:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 18 17:53:53 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 17:53:53 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Sat May 18 17:53:53 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 17:53:53 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Sat May 18 17:53:53 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 18 17:55:15 2013] Warning: source 11 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 72 at 10.222217 pixels away
[Sat May 18 17:55:16 2013] Warning, spatial fit 77 centroid is now closest to src. 34
[Sat May 18 17:55:16 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 18 17:55:16 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 18 17:55:16 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 18 17:55:16 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 18 17:55:16 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 18 17:55:16 2013] Source is confused with source 6
[Sun May 19 03:37:46 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 19 03:37:46 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.10"
[Sun May 19 03:37:46 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.633
[Sun May 19 03:37:46 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 74 for pass 1, mean size = 9.10"
[Sun May 19 07:31:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 07:31:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74.csv
[Sun May 19 07:31:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 07:31:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74.csv
[Sun May 19 07:31:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 19 07:31:06 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src74.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 07:31:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src74.csv
[Sun May 19 07:31:06 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 07:31:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src74.csv
[Sun May 19 07:31:06 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src74.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 19 07:31:57 2013] Source 72 is offset by -3.293823 and 5.744409 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.013223 x 1.758777, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 19 07:31:57 2013] Warning, spatial fit 74 centroid is now closest to src. 34
[Sun May 19 07:31:57 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 19 07:31:57 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 19 07:31:57 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 19 07:31:57 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 19 07:31:57 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 19 11:51:57 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(32299.673370, 26508.037598, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May 19 11:51:57 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src72_src.reg
[Sun May 19 11:51:57 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (334, 268) - (409, 343)
[Sun May 19 11:51:57 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(32299.673370, 26508.037598, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32582.733240, 26002.278000, 403.275212, 340.947210, 58.946500, X, Y) && !ellipse(30735.941440, 26931.124600, 433.212812, 364.565610, 51.568300, X, Y) && !ellipse(33565.464800, 24133.368800, 358.150410, 329.966409, 100.790000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32924.184052, 26499.323792, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35028.764709, 28904.830780, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32537.466000, 24263.879200, 301.595209, 301.595209, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30099.177124, 26906.552185, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32096.399017, 23706.716187, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May 19 11:51:57 2013] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src72.gif
[Sun May 19 12:33:24 2013] Mean detx,y = (-4061.14, 2438.03) 
[Sun May 19 12:33:26 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun May 19 12:33:37 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun May 19 12:33:37 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src72_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May 19 12:33:37 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0674210601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src72_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May 19 15:07:15 2013] Not generating rmf since there are only 60 counts
[Sun May 19 15:07:15 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts