[Fri Jun  7 08:53:33 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (311.1, 325.0) = 16 46 2.55 42 27 53.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 88.4 +/- 16.2
  Background counts = 27.2
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Fri Jun  7 08:53:33 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.13'
[Fri Jun  7 10:02:55 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  7 10:02:55 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.49"
[Fri Jun  7 10:02:55 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.658
[Fri Jun  7 10:02:55 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 7.49"
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:40 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:40 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:40 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:41 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:41 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:41 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:52 2013] Source 16 is offset by 6.954008 and 3.052550 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.930851 x 2.100556, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:52 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:52 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:52 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:52 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  7 10:46:52 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  7 11:16:59 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  7 11:16:59 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.49"
[Fri Jun  7 11:16:59 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.658
[Fri Jun  7 11:16:59 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 7.49"
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0673900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:21 2013] Source 16 is offset by -6.828153 and -2.514568 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.688322 x 4.688322, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  7 11:35:21 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9