[Sun Jun  2 23:07:45 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (183.1, 394.2) = 11 50 18.49 -12 10 12.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 62.3 +/- 11.8
  Background counts = 28.6
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Sun Jun  2 23:07:46 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.87'
[Sun Jun  2 23:10:03 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  2 23:10:03 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.86"
[Sun Jun  2 23:10:03 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.864
[Sun Jun  2 23:10:03 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 11.86"
[Mon Jun  3 02:09:40 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 02:09:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Mon Jun  3 02:09:40 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 02:09:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Mon Jun  3 02:09:40 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 02:09:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 02:09:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Mon Jun  3 02:09:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 02:09:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Mon Jun  3 02:09:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 06:10:53 2013] Warning: source 19 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 19 at 16.771551 pixels away
[Mon Jun  3 06:10:53 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun  3 06:10:53 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun  3 06:10:53 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun  3 06:10:53 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun  3 06:10:53 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  3 06:11:29 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  3 06:11:29 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.86"
[Mon Jun  3 06:11:29 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.864
[Mon Jun  3 06:11:29 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 11.86"
[Mon Jun  3 09:29:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 09:29:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Mon Jun  3 09:29:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 09:29:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Mon Jun  3 09:29:32 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 09:29:33 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 09:29:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Mon Jun  3 09:29:33 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  3 09:29:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Mon Jun  3 09:29:33 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673851601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  3 12:08:42 2013] Warning: source 18 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 19 at 14.100711 pixels away
[Mon Jun  3 12:08:42 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun  3 12:08:42 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun  3 12:08:42 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun  3 12:08:42 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun  3 12:08:42 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  3 12:08:42 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9