[Thu May 16 00:58:16 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (280.3, 309.7) = 7 32 30.04 31 37 12.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 76.0 +/- 12.3
  Background counts = 49.0
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001

[Thu May 16 00:58:17 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.55'
[Thu May 16 01:01:53 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 16 01:01:53 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.20"
[Thu May 16 01:01:53 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.645
[Thu May 16 01:01:53 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 32 for pass 0, mean size = 7.20"
[Thu May 16 02:42:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.ximg exists
[Thu May 16 02:42:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.csv
[Thu May 16 02:42:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 16 02:42:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.csv
[Thu May 16 02:42:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 16 02:42:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.ximg exists
[Thu May 16 02:42:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.csv
[Thu May 16 02:42:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 16 02:42:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.csv
[Thu May 16 02:42:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 16 05:55:05 2013] Source 34 is offset by -6.311550 and -2.629587 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.578943 x 6.623540, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 16 05:55:05 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 16 05:55:05 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 16 05:55:05 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 16 05:55:05 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 16 05:55:05 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 16 05:55:29 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 16 05:55:29 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.20"
[Thu May 16 05:55:29 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.645
[Thu May 16 05:55:29 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 7.20"
[Thu May 16 06:48:43 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Thu May 16 06:48:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Thu May 16 06:48:43 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 16 06:48:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Thu May 16 06:48:43 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 16 06:48:44 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Thu May 16 06:48:44 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Thu May 16 06:48:44 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 16 06:48:44 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Thu May 16 06:48:44 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 16 09:19:45 2013] Source 34 is offset by 6.887922 and 6.296827 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.034943 x 6.034943, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 16 09:19:45 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 16 09:19:45 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 16 09:19:45 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 16 09:19:45 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 16 09:19:45 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 16 09:19:45 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9