[Mon Aug 13 14:15:54 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (273.3, 440.1) = 11 58 26.32 28 20 7.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 32.6 +/- 8.9 Background counts = 16.6 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006 [Mon Aug 13 14:15:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.43' [Mon Aug 13 14:18:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Aug 13 14:18:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.64" [Mon Aug 13 14:18:55 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.892 [Mon Aug 13 14:18:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 11.64" [Mon Aug 13 15:14:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Mon Aug 13 15:14:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 13 15:14:31 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9 appears to have run properly [Mon Aug 13 15:14:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Mon Aug 13 15:14:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 13 15:14:31 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Mon Aug 13 15:51:34 2012] Source 9 is offset by -7.190994 and 2.589676 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.373678 x 1.373678, not incorporating fit results [Mon Aug 13 15:51:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 6 [Mon Aug 13 15:51:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Aug 13 15:51:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Aug 13 15:51:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Aug 13 15:51:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Aug 13 15:51:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Aug 13 15:51:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Aug 13 15:51:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.64" [Mon Aug 13 15:51:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.892 [Mon Aug 13 15:51:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.64" [Mon Aug 13 16:43:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Mon Aug 13 16:43:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Mon Aug 13 16:43:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 13 16:43:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Mon Aug 13 16:43:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Aug 13 16:43:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Mon Aug 13 16:43:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 13 16:43:41 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0673770501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Mon Aug 13 17:16:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 235.745000, observed total counts = 221.000000 [Mon Aug 13 17:16:24 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.403037 pixels [Mon Aug 13 17:16:24 2012] 238.311700 total counts/ 220.664000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.188016 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.403037 pixels Position = (273.2, 439.7) = 11 58 26.36 28 20 6.8 Extent = 4.7 (2.9-7.9)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 17.6 +/- 15.4 Background counts = 220.7 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability