[Sat May  4 05:24:19 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (429.6, 195.5) = 2 41 25.83 -50 54 10.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 44.0 +/- 9.3
  Background counts = 9.4
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Sat May  4 05:24:20 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.09'
[Sat May  4 05:25:25 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  4 05:25:25 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat May  4 05:25:25 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.47"
[Sat May  4 05:25:25 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.080
[Sat May  4 05:25:25 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 1 for pass 0, mean size = 12.47"
[Sat May  4 05:35:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:35:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.csv
[Sat May  4 05:35:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:35:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.csv
[Sat May  4 05:35:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 05:35:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:35:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Sat May  4 05:35:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:35:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Sat May  4 05:35:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 05:44:03 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 213.279000, observed total counts = 187.000000
[Sat May  4 05:44:03 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 1
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 05:44:03 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  4 05:44:03 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  4 05:44:03 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  4 05:44:03 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  4 05:44:03 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  4 05:44:08 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  4 05:44:08 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat May  4 05:44:08 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.47"
[Sat May  4 05:44:08 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.080
[Sat May  4 05:44:08 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 1 for pass 1, mean size = 12.47"
[Sat May  4 05:47:58 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:47:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.csv
[Sat May  4 05:47:58 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:47:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.csv
[Sat May  4 05:47:58 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 05:47:58 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:47:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Sat May  4 05:47:58 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:47:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Sat May  4 05:47:58 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0673610501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 05:55:11 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 212.133000, observed total counts = 187.000000
[Sat May  4 05:55:11 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 1
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 05:55:11 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  4 05:55:11 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  4 05:55:11 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  4 05:55:11 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  4 05:55:11 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  4 05:55:11 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9