[Sat Jun 22 22:43:54 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (508.2, 445.1) = 23 27 50.17 -0 8 19.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 142.5 +/- 22.6
  Background counts = 40.6
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Sat Jun 22 22:43:57 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 18.56'
[Sat Jun 22 23:47:19 2013] Using EEF radius (= 15.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 23:47:19 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 15.71"
[Sat Jun 22 23:47:19 2013] source mask rpix=3.6, npix_max = 67, mask sum = 64, frac = 0.947
[Sat Jun 22 23:47:19 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 15.71"
[Sun Jun 23 03:44:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 23 03:44:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Sun Jun 23 03:44:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 23 03:44:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Sun Jun 23 03:44:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 23 03:44:22 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 23 03:44:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sun Jun 23 03:44:22 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 23 03:44:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sun Jun 23 03:44:22 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 23 08:20:58 2013] Warning, spatial fit 4 centroid is now closest to src. 33
[Sun Jun 23 08:20:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 23 08:20:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 23 08:20:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 23 08:20:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 23 08:20:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 23 08:20:58 2013] Source is confused with source 38
[Sun Jun 23 08:20:58 2013] Source is confused with source 36
[Sun Jun 23 09:19:39 2013] Using EEF radius (= 15.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 23 09:19:39 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 15.71"
[Sun Jun 23 09:19:39 2013] source mask rpix=3.6, npix_max = 67, mask sum = 64, frac = 0.947
[Sun Jun 23 09:19:39 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 15.71"
[Sun Jun 23 12:28:54 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 23 12:28:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sun Jun 23 12:28:54 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 23 12:28:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sun Jun 23 12:28:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 23 12:28:55 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 23 12:28:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sun Jun 23 12:28:55 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 23 12:28:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sun Jun 23 12:28:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 23 16:35:38 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 69.629100, observed total counts = 53.000000
[Sun Jun 23 16:35:38 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 23 16:35:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 23 16:35:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 23 16:35:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 23 16:35:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 23 16:35:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 23 18:00:20 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(44166.085205, 38673.445557, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun 23 18:00:20 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src.reg
[Sun Jun 23 18:00:20 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (471, 408) - (546, 483)
[Sun Jun 23 18:00:20 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(44166.085205, 38673.445557, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(46034.779785, 35966.523712, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(44612.438110, 36665.784088, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(44346.879425, 39527.932220, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(44295.440887, 37364.739136, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(43364.813293, 41528.855225, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(44898.432556, 37265.645477, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(45648.510193, 38330.946777, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(44585.516113, 41268.659698, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(43771.433685, 40752.803436, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(44623.164429, 37884.076141, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(43910.074000, 38558.046000, 1067.808031, 1067.808031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(45541.783325, 37088.199249, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(44127.433289, 41267.523346, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(43341.653473, 40672.332153, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(43732.702118, 39125.026215, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun 23 18:00:20 2013] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5.gif
[Sun Jun 23 18:02:02 2013] Mean detx,y = (8716.82, 12941.36) 
[Sun Jun 23 18:02:03 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun Jun 23 18:02:11 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun Jun 23 18:02:11 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Jun 23 18:02:11 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun Jun 23 18:23:10 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun Jun 23 18:23:10 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:10 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:10 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src_b10.pi.gz = 28.00
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:10 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_bgd.pi.gz = 18.00
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:10 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1672.000000, 1798.000000
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:10 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (508.2, 445.1) = 23 27 50.17 -0 8 19.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = 11.3 +/- 6.4
  Background aperture counts = 16.7
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 6e-05

[Sun Jun 23 19:16:10 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:10 2013] Set source signif. to 11.26/4.09 = 2.75
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:21 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:21 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.000102, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5.arf
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:21 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:21 2013] Getting flux using calc_pl_flux failed
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:41 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Sun Jun 23 19:16:42 2013] xmm0673002301/analysis//spectral/fullrun_mos1_xmm0673002301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete