[Thu Aug 16 11:55:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (326.1, 337.2) = 11 19 2.70 -61 26 37.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 54.2 +/- 12.7
  Background counts = 38.5
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Thu Aug 16 11:55:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.45'
[Thu Aug 16 14:11:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 16 14:11:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.15"
[Thu Aug 16 14:11:27 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.108
[Thu Aug 16 14:11:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 8.15"
[Thu Aug 16 15:02:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 15:02:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Thu Aug 16 15:02:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 15:02:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Thu Aug 16 15:02:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 16 15:02:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 15:02:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 15:02:25 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug 16 16:13:29 2012] Source 26 is offset by -2.646543 and -2.989648 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.913586 x 1.913586, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Aug 16 16:13:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug 16 16:13:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug 16 16:13:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug 16 16:13:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug 16 16:13:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug 16 18:24:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 16 18:24:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.15"
[Thu Aug 16 18:24:47 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.108
[Thu Aug 16 18:24:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 8.15"
[Thu Aug 16 19:20:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 19:20:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 19:20:34 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug 16 19:20:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 19:20:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 19:20:34 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0672790101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug 16 20:22:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 556.150000, observed total counts = 556.000000
[Thu Aug 16 20:22:18 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 26 = 0.251061 pixels
[Thu Aug 16 20:22:18 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 22 to 13
[Thu Aug 16 20:22:18 2012] 547.072070 total counts/ 539.260000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.336409
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 26 = 0.251061 pixels
  Position = (326.0, 337.3) = 11 19 2.81 -61 26 36.4
  Extent = 2.0" x 2.0", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 7.8 +/- 23.4
  Background counts = 539.3
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 0.0006
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability