[Sat May 11 02:26:31 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (194.5, 384.0) = 20 1 10.63 22 49 58.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 63.8 +/- 14.4
  Background counts = 59.2
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Sat May 11 02:26:32 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.76'
[Sat May 11 03:14:59 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.31 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 11 03:14:59 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.31"
[Sat May 11 03:14:59 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.093
[Sat May 11 03:14:59 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 11.31"
[Sat May 11 03:35:28 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 03:35:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sat May 11 03:35:28 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 03:35:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sat May 11 03:35:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 11 03:35:28 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 03:35:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sat May 11 03:35:28 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 03:35:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sat May 11 03:35:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 11 03:35:36 2013] Source 5 is offset by -7.902450 and -5.254249 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.309728 x 1.309728, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 11 03:35:36 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 11 03:35:36 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 11 03:35:36 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 11 03:35:36 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 11 03:35:36 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 11 04:21:51 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.31 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 11 04:21:51 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.31"
[Sat May 11 04:21:51 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.093
[Sat May 11 04:21:51 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.31"
[Sat May 11 04:37:43 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 04:37:43 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 04:37:43 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 11 04:37:43 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 04:37:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sat May 11 04:37:43 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 04:37:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sat May 11 04:37:43 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0672390201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 11 04:37:52 2013] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 80.547516 pixels away
[Sat May 11 04:37:52 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 251.111000, observed total counts = 231.000000
[Sat May 11 04:37:52 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.641072 pixels
[Sat May 11 04:37:52 2013] 256.002400 total counts/ 227.344000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.900685
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.641072 pixels
  Position = (194.8, 383.4) = 20 1 10.56 22 49 55.6
  Extent = 8.1 (4.6-20.5)" x 3.0 (2.8-6.2)", rotation angle = 325
  Source counts = 28.7 +/- 16.0
  Background counts = 227.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0005
[Sat May 11 04:37:52 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 11 04:37:52 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 11 04:37:52 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 11 04:37:52 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 11 04:37:52 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.75
[Sat May 11 04:37:52 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9