[Mon Jun 24 18:34:49 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (419.8, 382.2) = 16 26 39.97 42 48 18.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 51.7 +/- 10.9
  Background counts = 22.7
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Jun 24 18:34:50 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.69'
[Mon Jun 24 18:36:56 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 24 18:36:56 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.77"
[Mon Jun 24 18:36:56 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.875
[Mon Jun 24 18:36:56 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 11.77"
[Mon Jun 24 19:54:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 19:54:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Mon Jun 24 19:54:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 19:54:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Mon Jun 24 19:54:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 24 19:54:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 19:54:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Mon Jun 24 19:54:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 19:54:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Mon Jun 24 19:54:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 24 21:20:18 2013] Warning: source 18 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 19 at 15.796805 pixels away
[Mon Jun 24 21:20:18 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 24 21:20:18 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 24 21:20:18 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 24 21:20:18 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 24 21:20:18 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 24 21:20:36 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 24 21:20:36 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.77"
[Mon Jun 24 21:20:36 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.875
[Mon Jun 24 21:20:36 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 11.77"
[Mon Jun 24 22:31:21 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 22:31:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 24 22:31:21 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 22:31:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 24 22:31:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 24 22:31:22 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 22:31:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 24 22:31:22 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 22:31:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 24 22:31:22 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0670350501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 24 23:54:39 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 272.550000, observed total counts = 241.000000
[Mon Jun 24 23:54:39 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 24 23:54:39 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 24 23:54:39 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 24 23:54:39 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 24 23:54:39 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 24 23:54:39 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 24 23:54:39 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0