[Tue Jun 11 02:01:26 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (465.9, 294.6) = 22 53 21.16 -17 36 4.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 101.5 +/- 17.8
  Background counts = 76.1
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Jun 11 02:01:26 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.15'
[Tue Jun 11 03:35:07 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 11 03:35:07 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.50"
[Tue Jun 11 03:35:07 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.922
[Tue Jun 11 03:35:07 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 12.50"
[Tue Jun 11 04:50:17 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 04:50:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Tue Jun 11 04:50:17 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 04:50:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Tue Jun 11 04:50:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 11 04:50:18 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 04:50:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Tue Jun 11 04:50:18 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 04:50:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Tue Jun 11 04:50:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 11 08:13:50 2013] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 35 at 15.167224 pixels away
[Tue Jun 11 08:13:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 11 08:13:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 11 08:13:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 11 08:13:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 11 08:13:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 11 09:47:41 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 11 09:47:41 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.50"
[Tue Jun 11 09:47:41 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.922
[Tue Jun 11 09:47:41 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 12.50"
[Tue Jun 11 10:27:56 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 10:27:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Tue Jun 11 10:27:56 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 10:27:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Tue Jun 11 10:27:56 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 11 10:27:57 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 10:27:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Tue Jun 11 10:27:57 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 10:27:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Tue Jun 11 10:27:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0670120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 11 15:10:54 2013] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 35 at 15.974937 pixels away
[Tue Jun 11 15:10:54 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 11 15:10:54 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 11 15:10:54 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 11 15:10:54 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 11 15:10:54 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 11 15:10:54 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9