[Thu Jul  4 13:48:03 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (204.9, 157.0) = 17 46 15.68 -29 12 10.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 66.2 +/- 14.8
  Background counts = 49.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Thu Jul  4 13:48:04 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.29'
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.57"
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:40 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.783
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 90 for pass 0, mean size = 12.57"
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:41 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:41 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:41 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:43 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:43 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv
[Thu Jul  4 13:48:43 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0658600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul  4 13:49:12 2013] Source 84 is offset by -9.100182 and -1.759971 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.778598 x 1.778598, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jul  4 13:49:12 2013] Source 84 is offset by -9.400894 and 3.336075 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.459789 x 1.459789, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jul  4 13:49:12 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 653.867000, observed total counts = 567.000000
[Thu Jul  4 13:49:12 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 84
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jul  4 13:49:12 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jul  4 13:49:12 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jul  4 13:49:12 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jul  4 13:49:12 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jul  4 13:49:12 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jul  4 13:49:12 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9