[Wed Jun 20 16:00:23 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (414.2, 316.1) = 3 35 20.02 -6 57 36.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 26.0 +/- 7.1
  Background counts = 7.4
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Wed Jun 20 16:00:23 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.49'
[Wed Jun 20 17:46:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 20 17:46:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.67"
[Wed Jun 20 17:46:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.003
[Wed Jun 20 17:46:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 10.67"
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:13 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:14 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:26 2012] Source 8 is offset by -4.324424 and -7.419558 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.226754 x 1.226754, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 20 18:19:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 20 19:43:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 20 19:43:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.67"
[Wed Jun 20 19:43:09 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.003
[Wed Jun 20 19:43:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 10.67"
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:20 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0658200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 104.848000, observed total counts = 104.000000
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:32 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.148794 pixels
[Wed Jun 20 20:13:32 2012] 107.236500 total counts/ 92.872900 bgd. counts: snr = 1.490455
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.148794 pixels
  Position = (414.0, 316.2) = 3 35 20.06 -6 57 36.6
  Extent = 3.2 (2.7-4.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 14.4 +/- 10.4
  Background counts = 92.9
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0006
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability