[Thu Jun  6 15:33:54 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (319.7, 329.9) = 9 55 40.12 69 44 37.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 67.8 +/- 16.2
  Background counts = 83.0
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Thu Jun  6 15:33:55 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.75'
[Thu Jun  6 15:37:00 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  6 15:37:00 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.81"
[Thu Jun  6 15:37:00 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.950
[Thu Jun  6 15:37:00 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 7.81"
[Thu Jun  6 17:58:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 17:58:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Thu Jun  6 17:58:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 17:58:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Thu Jun  6 17:58:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 17:58:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 17:58:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Thu Jun  6 17:58:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 17:58:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Thu Jun  6 17:58:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:19 2013] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 10.792366 pixels away
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:19 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 845.980000, observed total counts = 733.000000
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:19 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:19 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:19 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:19 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:19 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:19 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:19 2013] Source is confused with source 13
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:19 2013] Source is confused with source 19
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.81"
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:40 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.950
[Thu Jun  6 20:23:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 7.81"
[Thu Jun  6 22:47:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 22:47:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Thu Jun  6 22:47:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 22:47:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Thu Jun  6 22:47:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 22:47:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 22:47:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Thu Jun  6 22:47:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 22:47:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Thu Jun  6 22:47:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0657802101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  7 00:10:45 2013] Source 17 is offset by -1.286587 and 4.609141 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.035453 x 1.035453, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun  7 00:10:45 2013] Source 17 is offset by -1.265451 and 4.691596 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.187214 x 1.187214, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun  7 00:10:45 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  7 00:10:45 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  7 00:10:45 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun  7 00:10:45 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  7 00:10:45 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  7 00:10:45 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9