[Wed Jun 13 03:38:36 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (171.2, 379.4) = 5 41 17.82 -1 49 25.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 48.9 +/- 10.5 Background counts = 31.7 Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0001 [Wed Jun 13 03:38:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.93' [Wed Jun 13 07:40:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jun 13 07:40:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.89" [Wed Jun 13 07:40:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.621 [Wed Jun 13 07:40:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 0, mean size = 11.89" [Wed Jun 13 12:21:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.ximg exists [Wed Jun 13 12:21:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.csv [Wed Jun 13 12:21:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 13 12:21:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.csv [Wed Jun 13 12:21:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 13 12:21:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists [Wed Jun 13 12:21:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.csv [Wed Jun 13 12:21:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 13 12:21:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.csv [Wed Jun 13 12:21:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0657200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 13 12:21:27 2012] Warning, spatial fit 41 centroid is now closest to src. 22 [Wed Jun 13 12:21:28 2012] Warning, spatial fit 59 centroid is now closest to src. 20 [Wed Jun 13 12:21:28 2012] Warning, spatial fit 65 centroid is now closest to src. 52 [Wed Jun 13 12:21:39 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 2 [Wed Jun 13 12:21:39 2012] Warning: source 19 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 13.660088 pixels away [Wed Jun 13 12:21:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 45 centroid is now closest to src. 43 [Wed Jun 13 12:21:40 2012] Warning: source 68 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 14.862256 pixels away [Wed Jun 13 12:21:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jun 13 12:21:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jun 13 12:21:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jun 13 12:21:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jun 13 12:21:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jun 13 12:21:40 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9