[Sun Aug 5 06:21:10 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (313.3, 331.0) = 15 55 40.53 11 12 12.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 197.5 +/- 23.6 Background counts = 13.6 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001 [Sun Aug 5 06:21:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.60' [Sun Aug 5 07:19:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Aug 5 07:19:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.73" [Sun Aug 5 07:19:33 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.917 [Sun Aug 5 07:19:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 7.73" [Sun Aug 5 08:24:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Sun Aug 5 08:24:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Sun Aug 5 08:24:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Sun Aug 5 08:24:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Sun Aug 5 08:24:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Aug 5 08:24:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Sun Aug 5 08:24:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Sun Aug 5 08:24:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Sun Aug 5 08:24:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Sun Aug 5 08:24:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Aug 5 08:24:57 2012] Source 3 is offset by 7.409613 and 6.103461 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.482074 x 2.482074, not incorporating fit results [Sun Aug 5 08:24:57 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1117.890000, observed total counts = 1017.000000 [Sun Aug 5 08:24:57 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 1.082435 pixels [Sun Aug 5 08:24:57 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 5 to 12 [Sun Aug 5 08:24:57 2012] 1029.707000 total counts/ 931.449000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.219500 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 1.082435 pixels Position = (313.5, 332.1) = 15 55 40.48 11 12 14.1 Extent = 4.4" x 4.4", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 98.3 +/- 32.1 Background counts = 931.4 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001 [Sun Aug 5 08:24:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Aug 5 08:24:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Aug 5 08:24:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Aug 5 08:24:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Aug 5 08:24:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Aug 5 09:13:40 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Aug 5 09:13:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 4.45" [Sun Aug 5 09:13:40 2012] source mask rpix=1.0, npix_max = 9, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.971 [Sun Aug 5 09:13:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 4.45" [Sun Aug 5 09:46:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists [Sun Aug 5 09:46:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv [Sun Aug 5 09:46:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists [Sun Aug 5 09:46:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv [Sun Aug 5 09:46:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Aug 5 09:46:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Sun Aug 5 09:46:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Sun Aug 5 09:46:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Sun Aug 5 09:46:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Sun Aug 5 09:46:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0656990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Aug 5 09:46:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 5 [Sun Aug 5 09:46:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Aug 5 09:46:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Aug 5 09:46:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Aug 5 09:46:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Aug 5 09:46:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Aug 5 09:46:46 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9