[Mon Jun 3 16:48:03 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (318.1, 338.5) = 0 48 29.48 -72 49 5.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 28.0 +/- 7.5 Background counts = 7.6 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.002 [Mon Jun 3 16:48:04 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.23' [Mon Jun 3 16:49:47 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jun 3 16:49:47 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.05" [Mon Jun 3 16:49:47 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.906 [Mon Jun 3 16:49:47 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 8.05" [Mon Jun 3 17:00:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 17:00:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Mon Jun 3 17:00:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 17:00:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Mon Jun 3 17:00:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 3 17:00:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 17:00:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon Jun 3 17:00:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 3 17:00:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon Jun 3 17:00:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0656780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 3 17:18:57 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 96.252700, observed total counts = 87.000000 [Mon Jun 3 17:18:57 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.189946 pixels [Mon Jun 3 17:18:57 2013] 94.799000 total counts/ 73.489100 bgd. counts: snr = 2.485822 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.189946 pixels Position = (318.0, 338.3) = 0 48 29.58 -72 49 5.2 Extent = 8.5 (2.5-16.1)" x 3.5 (2.2-7.8)", rotation angle = 98 (90-90) degrees Source counts = 21.3 +/- 9.7 Background counts = 73.5 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.002 [Mon Jun 3 17:18:57 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jun 3 17:18:57 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jun 3 17:18:57 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Mon Jun 3 17:18:57 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jun 3 17:18:57 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.32 [Mon Jun 3 17:18:57 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9