[Sun Feb 12 11:22:05 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (305.7, 303.1) = 5 49 5.73 -62 4 56.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 38.0 +/- 9.3
  Background counts = 9.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Sun Feb 12 11:22:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.62'
[Sun Feb 12 12:53:50 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Feb 12 12:53:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.74"
[Sun Feb 12 12:53:50 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.952
[Sun Feb 12 12:53:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 6.74"
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:05 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:18 2012] Source 9 is offset by -6.520061 and -6.572654 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.667950 x 2.667950, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Feb 12 13:39:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Feb 12 14:30:39 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Feb 12 14:30:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.74"
[Sun Feb 12 14:30:39 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.952
[Sun Feb 12 14:30:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 6.74"
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:11 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:11 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0656201301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:19 2012] Source 9 is offset by 5.606031 and -0.076553 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.815090 x 2.815090, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Feb 12 15:36:19 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9