[Fri Dec 16 22:21:15 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (261.2, 297.0) = 3 13 4.63 8 22 23.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 70.8 +/- 14.0
  Background counts = 27.0
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.002

[Fri Dec 16 22:21:15 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.70'
[Fri Dec 16 22:22:49 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Dec 16 22:22:49 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.78"
[Fri Dec 16 22:22:49 2011] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.764
[Fri Dec 16 22:22:49 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 7.78"
[Fri Dec 16 23:55:51 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Fri Dec 16 23:55:51 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Fri Dec 16 23:55:51 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23 appears to have run properly
[Fri Dec 16 23:55:52 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Fri Dec 16 23:55:52 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Fri Dec 16 23:55:52 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sat Dec 17 03:38:57 2011] Source 24 is offset by 7.310529 and -1.389189 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.790032 x 3.790032, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Dec 17 03:38:57 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Dec 17 03:38:57 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Dec 17 03:38:57 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Dec 17 03:38:57 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Dec 17 03:38:57 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Dec 17 03:38:58 2011] Source is confused with source 22
[Sat Dec 17 03:39:32 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Dec 17 03:39:32 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.78"
[Sat Dec 17 03:39:32 2011] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.764
[Sat Dec 17 03:39:32 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 7.78"
[Sat Dec 17 05:46:36 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 05:46:36 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Sat Dec 17 05:46:36 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 05:46:36 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Sat Dec 17 05:46:36 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec 17 05:46:37 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 05:46:37 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 05:46:37 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0656201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16 appears to have run properly
[Sat Dec 17 08:35:39 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 670.513000, observed total counts = 670.000000
[Sat Dec 17 08:35:39 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 0.374815 pixels
[Sat Dec 17 08:35:39 2011] 651.039200 total counts/ 631.092000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.794028
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 0.374815 pixels
  Position = (260.9, 297.3) = 3 13 4.70 8 22 24.7
  Extent = 5.3 (1.9-15.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 19.9 +/- 25.5
  Background counts = 631.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability