[Mon Mar 12 10:32:56 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (241.9, 251.4) = 20 53 3.43 -61 14 57.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 34.1 +/- 8.4
  Background counts = 11.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Mon Mar 12 10:32:57 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.33'
[Mon Mar 12 12:02:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 12 12:02:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.09"
[Mon Mar 12 12:02:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.117
[Mon Mar 12 12:02:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 9.09"
[Mon Mar 12 12:54:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 12:54:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Mon Mar 12 12:54:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 12:54:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Mon Mar 12 12:54:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 12 12:54:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 12:54:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 12:54:02 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 12 13:52:08 2012] Source 20 is offset by -4.623071 and 6.976228 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.045343 x 1.045343, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Mar 12 13:52:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 12 13:52:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 12 13:52:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar 12 13:52:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 12 13:52:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 12 15:11:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 12 15:11:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.09"
[Mon Mar 12 15:11:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.117
[Mon Mar 12 15:11:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 9.09"
[Mon Mar 12 15:56:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 15:56:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 15:56:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 12 15:56:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 15:56:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 15:56:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0656200701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 12 16:47:27 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 152.737000, observed total counts = 153.000000
[Mon Mar 12 16:47:27 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 0.327091 pixels
[Mon Mar 12 16:47:27 2012] 150.404400 total counts/ 133.521000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.461117
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 0.327091 pixels
  Position = (242.1, 251.1) = 20 53 3.35 -61 14 58.3
  Extent = 3.2 (2.3-5.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 16.9 +/- 12.3
  Background counts = 133.5
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0005
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability