[Tue Jul 31 10:38:29 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (416.2, 234.3) = 9 45 4.38 -14 22 43.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 46.6 +/- 9.5 Background counts = 17.3 Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0002 [Tue Jul 31 10:38:29 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.72' [Tue Jul 31 12:07:56 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 31 12:07:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.29" [Tue Jul 31 12:07:56 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.626 [Tue Jul 31 12:07:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 11.29" [Tue Jul 31 12:50:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists [Tue Jul 31 12:50:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv [Tue Jul 31 12:50:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 31 12:50:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv [Tue Jul 31 12:50:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 31 12:50:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists [Tue Jul 31 12:50:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv [Tue Jul 31 12:50:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 31 12:50:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv [Tue Jul 31 12:50:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 31 12:51:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 209.243000, observed total counts = 177.000000 [Tue Jul 31 12:51:10 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 15 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 31 12:51:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 31 12:51:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 31 12:51:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 31 12:51:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 31 12:51:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 31 13:42:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 31 13:42:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.29" [Tue Jul 31 13:42:22 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.626 [Tue Jul 31 13:42:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 11.29" [Tue Jul 31 14:36:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists [Tue Jul 31 14:36:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv [Tue Jul 31 14:36:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 31 14:36:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv [Tue Jul 31 14:36:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 31 14:36:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists [Tue Jul 31 14:36:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv [Tue Jul 31 14:36:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 31 14:36:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv [Tue Jul 31 14:36:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0654910701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 31 14:37:10 2012] Warning: source 19 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 15 at 12.529437 pixels away [Tue Jul 31 14:37:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 31 14:37:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 31 14:37:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 31 14:37:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 31 14:37:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 31 14:37:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9