[Sat May 5 13:20:20 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (273.9, 309.8) = 15 2 17.57 -42 6 16.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 4333.6 +/- 117.7 Background counts = 2689.1 Rate = 0.05 +/- 0.001 [Sat May 5 13:21:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.96' [Sat May 5 14:13:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat May 5 14:13:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.41" [Sat May 5 14:13:30 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.824 [Sat May 5 14:13:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 90 for pass 0, mean size = 7.41" [Wed May 9 07:26:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg exists [Wed May 9 07:26:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv [Wed May 9 07:26:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg exists [Wed May 9 07:26:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv [Wed May 9 07:26:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 9 07:26:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg exists [Wed May 9 07:26:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg exists [Wed May 9 07:26:17 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90 appears to have run properly [Sat May 12 16:33:47 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 49860.100000, observed total counts = 47998.000000 [Sat May 12 16:33:47 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 94 = 4.551894 pixels [Sat May 12 16:33:47 2012] 46786.100000 total counts/ 25600.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 132.413125 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 94 = 4.551894 pixels Position = (275.3, 314.2) = 15 2 17.00 -42 5 58.7 Extent = 14.8 (14.8-29.6)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 21186.1 +/- 216.3 Background counts = 25600.0 Rate = 0.2 +/- 0.002 [Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.82" [Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] source mask rpix=3.4, npix_max = 61, mask sum = 41, frac = 0.672 [Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 88 for pass 1, mean size = 14.82" [Mon May 14 16:21:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.ximg exists [Mon May 14 16:21:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.csv [Mon May 14 16:21:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88_1.ximg exists [Mon May 14 16:21:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.csv [Mon May 14 16:21:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.ximg exists [Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.csv [Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg exists [Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.csv [Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes