[Sat May  5 13:20:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (256.9, 277.0) = 15 2 24.22 -42 8 40.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 12620.7 +/- 151.7
  Background counts = 1056.5
  Rate = 0.2 +/- 0.002

[Sat May  5 13:21:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.39'
[Sat May  5 14:13:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  5 14:13:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.12"
[Sat May  5 14:13:30 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.714
[Sat May  5 14:13:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 8.12"
[Wed May  9 07:26:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 07:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Wed May  9 07:26:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 07:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Wed May  9 07:26:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  9 07:26:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 07:26:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 07:26:16 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 16:33:46 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 70810.100000, observed total counts = 74679.000000
[Sat May 12 16:33:46 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 4.556752 pixels
[Sat May 12 16:33:46 2012] 62120.000000 total counts/ 25600.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 228.250000
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 4.556752 pixels
  Position = (259.2, 280.9) = 15 2 23.30 -42 8 23.4
  Extent = 16.2 (16.2-32.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 36520.0 +/- 249.2
  Background counts = 25600.0
  Rate = 0.3 +/- 0.002
[Sat May 12 16:33:46 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 67550.100000, observed total counts = 65090.000000
[Sat May 12 16:33:46 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 2.299983 pixels
[Sat May 12 16:33:46 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 23
[Sat May 12 16:33:46 2012] 55104.000000 total counts/ 25600.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 184.400000
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 2.299983 pixels
  Position = (260.9, 279.3) = 15 2 22.66 -42 8 30.4
  Extent = 18.0" x 18.0", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 29504.0 +/- 234.7
  Background counts = 25600.0
  Rate = 0.3 +/- 0.002
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Source is confused with source 23
[Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 17.95"
[Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] source mask rpix=4.1, npix_max = 85, mask sum = 90, frac = 1.051
[Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 17.95"
[Mon May 14 16:21:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Mon May 14 16:21:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon May 14 16:21:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 14 16:21:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon May 14 16:21:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 14 16:21:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon May 14 16:21:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 14 16:21:28 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly