[Sat May  5 13:20:15 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (183.1, 473.4) = 15 2 52.90 -41 54 16.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 724.6 +/- 45.4
  Background counts = 718.4
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0004

[Sat May  5 13:21:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.19'
[Sat May  5 14:13:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  5 14:13:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.03"
[Sat May  5 14:13:30 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.865
[Sat May  5 14:13:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 70 for pass 0, mean size = 14.03"
[Wed May  9 07:26:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 07:26:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.csv
[Wed May  9 07:26:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 07:26:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.csv
[Wed May  9 07:26:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  9 07:26:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 07:26:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.csv
[Wed May  9 07:26:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 07:26:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.csv
[Wed May  9 07:26:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 16:33:47 2012] Warning, spatial fit 70 centroid is now closest to src. 69
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 16:33:48 2012] Source is confused with source 72
[Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.03"
[Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.865
[Sat May 12 16:36:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 1, mean size = 14.03"
[Mon May 14 16:21:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg exists
[Mon May 14 16:21:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv
[Mon May 14 16:21:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 14 16:21:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv
[Mon May 14 16:21:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 14 16:21:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists
[Mon May 14 16:21:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv
[Mon May 14 16:21:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 14 16:21:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv
[Mon May 14 16:21:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes