[Sat May 5 13:21:17 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (252.9, 264.0) = 15 2 25.77 -42 9 36.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 4452.6 +/- 89.7 Background counts = 404.5 Rate = 0.05 +/- 0.001 [Sat May 5 13:22:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.14' [Wed May 9 07:26:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed May 9 07:26:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.50" [Wed May 9 07:26:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.831 [Wed May 9 07:26:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 8.50" [Thu May 10 12:15:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Thu May 10 12:15:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Thu May 10 12:15:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 12:15:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Thu May 10 12:15:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 10 12:15:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Thu May 10 12:15:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Thu May 10 12:15:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 12:15:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Thu May 10 12:15:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 12 16:34:22 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 21772.800000, observed total counts = 19029.000000 [Sat May 12 16:34:22 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 8 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat May 12 16:34:23 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 18791.400000, observed total counts = 13671.000000 [Sat May 12 16:34:23 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 8 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.50" [Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.831 [Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 8.50"