[Sat May  5 13:21:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (301.7, 288.0) = 15 2 6.69 -42 7 52.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 5761.1 +/- 101.3
  Background counts = 430.4
  Rate = 0.05 +/- 0.0009

[Sat May  5 13:22:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.79'
[Wed May  9 07:26:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May  9 07:26:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.82"
[Wed May  9 07:26:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.935
[Wed May  9 07:26:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 6.82"
[Thu May 10 12:15:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 12:15:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Thu May 10 12:15:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 12:15:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Thu May 10 12:15:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 12:15:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 12:15:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 12:15:53 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 16:34:22 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 6
[Sat May 12 16:34:22 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 29122.500000, observed total counts = 28909.000000
[Sat May 12 16:34:22 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.805467 pixels
[Sat May 12 16:34:22 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 6 to 9
[Sat May 12 16:34:22 2012] 28564.430000 total counts/ 23220.600000 bgd. counts: snr = 35.068397
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.805467 pixels
  Position = (301.3, 287.4) = 15 2 6.86 -42 7 55.3
  Extent = 14.0 (13.9-28.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 5343.8 +/- 169.0
  Background counts = 23220.6
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.001
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Source is confused with source 4
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Source is confused with source 6
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Source is confused with source 17
[Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.98"
[Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.889
[Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 13.98"