[Sat May  5 13:21:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (238.5, 378.3) = 15 2 31.36 -42 1 21.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 459.1 +/- 36.8
  Background counts = 456.8
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0005

[Sat May  5 13:22:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.24'
[Wed May  9 07:26:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May  9 07:26:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.05"
[Wed May  9 07:26:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.792
[Wed May  9 07:26:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 0, mean size = 10.05"
[Thu May 10 12:15:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 12:15:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Thu May 10 12:15:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 12:15:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Thu May 10 12:15:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 12:15:55 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 12:15:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Thu May 10 12:15:55 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 12:15:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Thu May 10 12:15:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0653860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 16:34:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 94 centroid is now closest to src. 265
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 16:34:25 2012] Source is confused with source 93
[Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.05"
[Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.792
[Mon May 14 16:21:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 1, mean size = 10.05"