[Thu May  3 10:48:22 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (193.6, 462.5) = 7 9 19.59 -49 20 10.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 106.5 +/- 17.6
  Background counts = 63.2
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0001

[Thu May  3 10:48:29 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.11'
[Thu May  3 16:41:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 16:41:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.49"
[Thu May  3 16:41:48 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.926
[Thu May  3 16:41:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 0, mean size = 13.49"
[Thu May  3 20:34:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 20:34:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.csv
[Thu May  3 20:34:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 20:34:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.csv
[Thu May  3 20:34:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  3 20:34:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 20:34:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Thu May  3 20:34:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 20:34:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Thu May  3 20:34:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  3 20:35:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 673.016000, observed total counts = 491.000000
[Thu May  3 20:35:43 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 23
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May  3 20:35:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  3 20:35:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  3 20:35:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May  3 20:35:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  3 20:35:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  4 00:46:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  4 00:46:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.49"
[Fri May  4 00:46:10 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.926
[Fri May  4 00:46:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 1, mean size = 13.49"
[Fri May  4 03:28:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 03:28:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.csv
[Fri May  4 03:28:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 03:28:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.csv
[Fri May  4 03:28:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  4 03:28:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 03:28:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Fri May  4 03:28:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 03:28:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Fri May  4 03:28:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0653510401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  4 03:29:34 2012] Warning: source 25 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 23 at 15.004626 pixels away
[Fri May  4 03:29:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 34 centroid is now closest to src. 22
[Fri May  4 03:29:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  4 03:29:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  4 03:29:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May  4 03:29:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  4 03:29:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  4 03:29:34 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9