[Mon Mar 19 03:24:33 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (391.2, 150.4) = 12 24 39.88 -64 13 41.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 62.1 +/- 9.9 Background counts = 5.9 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005 [Mon Mar 19 03:24:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.67' [Mon Mar 19 04:06:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 19 04:06:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.76" [Mon Mar 19 04:06:58 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.806 [Mon Mar 19 04:06:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 12.76" [Mon Mar 19 04:31:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 04:31:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Mon Mar 19 04:31:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 04:31:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Mon Mar 19 04:31:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 19 04:31:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 04:31:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon Mar 19 04:31:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 04:31:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon Mar 19 04:31:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 19 04:31:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 138.474000, observed total counts = 107.000000 [Mon Mar 19 04:31:32 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Mar 19 04:31:32 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Mar 19 04:31:32 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Mar 19 04:31:32 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Mar 19 04:31:32 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Mar 19 04:31:32 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Mar 19 05:19:17 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 19 05:19:17 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.76" [Mon Mar 19 05:19:17 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.806 [Mon Mar 19 05:19:17 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 12.76" [Mon Mar 19 05:38:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 05:38:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv [Mon Mar 19 05:38:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 05:38:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv [Mon Mar 19 05:38:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 19 05:38:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 05:38:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon Mar 19 05:38:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 05:38:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon Mar 19 05:38:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 19 05:38:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 138.710000, observed total counts = 107.000000 [Mon Mar 19 05:38:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Mar 19 05:38:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Mar 19 05:38:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Mar 19 05:38:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Mar 19 05:38:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Mar 19 05:38:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Mar 19 06:02:19 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(33987.228577, 13034.758224, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Mar 19 06:02:19 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_src.reg [Mon Mar 19 06:02:19 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (354, 113) - (429, 188) [Mon Mar 19 06:02:19 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(33987.228577, 13034.758224, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) [Mon Mar 19 06:02:19 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12.gif [Mon Mar 19 06:03:56 2012] Mean detx,y = (5932.65, -15966.48) [Mon Mar 19 06:03:58 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Mon Mar 19 06:04:24 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Mon Mar 19 06:04:24 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Mar 19 06:04:24 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_bgd.pi.gz [Mon Mar 19 06:10:02 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 62 counts [Mon Mar 19 06:10:02 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Mon Mar 19 06:11:10 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Mon Mar 19 06:11:10 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Mar 19 06:11:10 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Mon Mar 19 06:11:10 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00334, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0653030701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12.arf [Mon Mar 19 06:11:10 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Mon Mar 19 06:11:10 2012] Updating source flux to 1.9e-13 [Mon Mar 19 06:11:12 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting