[Sun Mar 4 07:58:20 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (329.3, 191.0) = 10 49 8.27 49 56 54.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 101.7 +/- 13.9 Background counts = 54.2 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0009 [Sun Mar 4 07:58:20 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.10' [Sun Mar 4 08:00:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Mar 4 08:00:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.48" [Sun Mar 4 08:00:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.650 [Sun Mar 4 08:00:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 10.48" [Sun Mar 4 08:24:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists [Sun Mar 4 08:24:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv [Sun Mar 4 08:24:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 4 08:24:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv [Sun Mar 4 08:24:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Mar 4 08:24:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists [Sun Mar 4 08:24:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv [Sun Mar 4 08:24:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 4 08:24:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv [Sun Mar 4 08:24:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Mar 4 08:53:43 2012] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 18 at 14.490552 pixels away [Sun Mar 4 08:53:43 2012] Warning, spatial fit 18 centroid is now closest to src. 30 [Sun Mar 4 08:53:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Mar 4 08:53:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Mar 4 08:53:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Mar 4 08:53:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Mar 4 08:53:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Mar 4 08:53:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Mar 4 08:53:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.48" [Sun Mar 4 08:53:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.650 [Sun Mar 4 08:53:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 10.48" [Sun Mar 4 09:16:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists [Sun Mar 4 09:16:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv [Sun Mar 4 09:16:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 4 09:16:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv [Sun Mar 4 09:16:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Mar 4 09:16:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists [Sun Mar 4 09:16:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv [Sun Mar 4 09:16:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 4 09:16:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv [Sun Mar 4 09:16:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Mar 4 09:45:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 356.145000, observed total counts = 293.000000 [Sun Mar 4 09:45:10 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 18 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun Mar 4 09:45:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Mar 4 09:45:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Mar 4 09:45:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Mar 4 09:45:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Mar 4 09:45:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Mar 4 09:45:21 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28600.798065, 16568.056610, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Mar 4 09:45:21 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18_src.reg [Sun Mar 4 09:45:21 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (292, 153) - (367, 228) [Sun Mar 4 09:45:21 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28600.798065, 16568.056610, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29315.691254, 14445.692566, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Mar 4 09:45:21 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18.gif [Sun Mar 4 09:53:49 2012] Mean detx,y = (2698.71, -7473.00) [Sun Mar 4 09:53:51 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sun Mar 4 09:54:03 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sun Mar 4 09:54:03 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18_src_b10.pi.gz [Sun Mar 4 09:54:03 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18_bgd.pi.gz [Sun Mar 4 10:10:16 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sun Mar 4 10:10:16 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sun Mar 4 10:46:23 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sun Mar 4 10:46:23 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18_src_b10.pi.gz [Sun Mar 4 10:46:23 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sun Mar 4 10:46:23 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00678, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0652810201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src18.arf [Sun Mar 4 10:46:23 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sun Mar 4 10:46:23 2012] Updating source flux to 2.8e-14 [Sun Mar 4 10:47:04 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting