[Mon Jul  8 16:01:07 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (100.8, 315.4) = 2 57 0.08 19 24 27.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 105.5 +/- 17.5
  Background counts = 66.0
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0001

[Mon Jul  8 16:01:07 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.38'
[Mon Jul  8 17:12:54 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul  8 17:12:54 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.62"
[Mon Jul  8 17:12:54 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 46, frac = 0.872
[Mon Jul  8 17:12:54 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 13.62"
[Mon Jul  8 18:08:28 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  8 18:08:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Mon Jul  8 18:08:28 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  8 18:08:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Mon Jul  8 18:08:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  8 18:08:29 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  8 18:08:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Mon Jul  8 18:08:29 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  8 18:08:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Mon Jul  8 18:08:29 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  8 18:32:08 2013] Warning: source 27 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 13.631396 pixels away
[Mon Jul  8 18:32:08 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul  8 18:32:08 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul  8 18:32:08 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul  8 18:32:08 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul  8 18:32:08 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul  8 19:34:44 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul  8 19:34:44 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.62"
[Mon Jul  8 19:34:44 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 46, frac = 0.872
[Mon Jul  8 19:34:44 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 1, mean size = 13.62"
[Mon Jul  8 20:06:51 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  8 20:06:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.csv
[Mon Jul  8 20:06:51 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  8 20:06:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.csv
[Mon Jul  8 20:06:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  8 20:06:51 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  8 20:06:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Mon Jul  8 20:06:51 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  8 20:06:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Mon Jul  8 20:06:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0652480201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  8 20:31:34 2013] Warning: source 24 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 17.979689 pixels away
[Mon Jul  8 20:31:34 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul  8 20:31:34 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul  8 20:31:34 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul  8 20:31:34 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul  8 20:31:34 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul  8 20:31:34 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0