[Sun Jun 9 21:35:47 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (322.8, 315.6) = 23 32 3.35 0 8 5.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 344.7 +/- 23.3 Background counts = 53.8 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0008 [Sun Jun 9 21:35:48 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.16' [Sun Jun 9 21:36:07 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 9 21:36:07 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.51" [Sun Jun 9 21:36:07 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.958 [Sun Jun 9 21:36:07 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 7.51" [Sun Jun 9 21:36:08 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 21:36:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Sun Jun 9 21:36:08 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 21:36:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Sun Jun 9 21:36:08 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 9 21:36:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 21:36:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Sun Jun 9 21:36:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 21:36:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Sun Jun 9 21:36:09 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652401401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 9 21:36:18 2013] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 19 [Sun Jun 9 21:36:18 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 361.794000, observed total counts = 381.000000 [Sun Jun 9 21:36:18 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.580143 pixels [Sun Jun 9 21:36:18 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 8 to 17 [Sun Jun 9 21:36:18 2013] 364.349000 total counts/ 364.349000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000000 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.580143 pixels Position = (323.1, 316.1) = 23 32 3.27 0 8 4.4 Extent = 3.2" x 3.2", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 0.0 +/- 19.1 Background counts = 364.3 Rate = 3e-23 +/- 0.0006 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability