[Tue Jun 25 04:36:06 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (383.5, 270.9) = 6 53 44.63 -23 56 3.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 277.9 +/- 24.7
  Background counts = 108.1
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0004

[Tue Jun 25 04:36:07 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.48'
[Tue Jun 25 04:42:47 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 04:42:47 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.67"
[Tue Jun 25 04:42:47 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.011
[Tue Jun 25 04:42:47 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 78 for pass 0, mean size = 9.67"
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.csv
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.csv
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.csv
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.csv
[Tue Jun 25 08:40:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1456.160000, observed total counts = 1265.000000
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 85
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 2013] Warning: source 80 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 85 at 10.942845 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:42 2013] Source is confused with source 87
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:29 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:29 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.67"
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:29 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.011
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:29 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 73 for pass 1, mean size = 9.67"
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.csv
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.csv
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Tue Jun 25 16:06:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:27 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1455.800000, observed total counts = 1265.000000
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:27 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 85
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:27 2013] Warning: source 74 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 85 at 10.942845 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:27 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:27 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:27 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:27 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:27 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 19:12:11 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(33318.538208, 23521.421692, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 25 19:12:11 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_src.reg
[Tue Jun 25 19:12:11 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (346, 233) - (421, 308)
[Tue Jun 25 19:12:11 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(33318.538208, 23521.421692, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33119.825195, 25025.238251, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36032.233032, 26155.200134, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32753.306366, 25755.724426, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33457.887421, 22906.819580, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36066.428440, 22461.641400, 801.752023, 801.752023, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34472.950256, 22126.327255, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 25 19:12:11 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85.gif