[Tue Jun 25 04:37:17 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (369.1, 213.7) = 6 53 49.19 -24 0 14.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 128.0 +/- 16.2
  Background counts = 44.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Jun 25 04:37:17 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.00'
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.43"
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 31, frac = 0.923
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 10.43"
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:56:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source 55 is offset by 2.774792 and -4.114616 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.187761 x 1.187761, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Warning: source 19 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 55 at 13.690555 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 11:57:04 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.43"
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 31, frac = 0.923
[Tue Jun 25 17:26:11 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 10.43"
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0652250701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:47 2013] Warning, spatial fit 19 centroid is now closest to src. 23
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 19:11:48 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00